Archive for August, 2005

Pat Robertson shares the love of Jesus again

23 August 2005 by Ron

Pat, Pat, Pat. I’ve said it before; Pat Robertson is just too freakin’ easy. I always feel a little bad when I pick on him. Not because he doesn’t deserve it, but because he’s such a steaming loaf of self-parody that (a) it’s too damn easy, and (b) no humourous exaggeration is ever possible, since he has already taken that extra step beyond.

This time, GifS friend Godless Wonder points us to another bit of the lunacy that is Pat’s OD on Jesus: “Televangelist Calls for Chavez’ Death“. As you may know, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is a left-leaning progressive who’s trying to use Venezuela’s oil revenues to provide education and health care for the people of Venezuela. He’s also an extremely outspoken critic of the Bush regime’s international policies, and has expressed some worry that the Bushies might try to assassinate him.

To this, Man of Jesus Pat Robertson says

if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it… It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war … and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop… We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability… We don’t need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator… It’s a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.

(And while we’re on the subject of Venezuela, you might like to check out “Buy Your Gas at Citgo: Join the BUY-cott!“)

UPDATE: This is getting a lot of mainstream coverage now; try Robertson AND Chavez at Google News to see.trailers porno adultporno video adultpornoghraphy adultavatars adult pornographicadult pornography australialaws adult pornographyadult pornpicsblack adult pornstar skyy Map

  • Share/Bookmark

Sectarianism

22 August 2005 by Sean

One of my fave subjects. Like two groups of children arguing over who has the coolest imaginary friend.

Anyway, from Wikipidia:


The principal issue upon which Islam’s first major sectarian split occurred centers on the question of leadership. According to Sunni thought, the Prophet Muhammad died without appointing a successor to lead the Muslim community. After an initial period of confusion, a group of his most prominent companions gathered and elected Abu Bakr, the Prophet’s friend, as the first Caliph. Sunnis believe this process was conducted in a fair and proper manner and accept Abu Bakr as a righteous and rightful Caliph. The second major sect, the Shia, believe that the Prophet had appointed his son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib as his successor years earlier during an announcement at Ghadir Khom. Shi’a regard the election of Abu Bakr as illegitimate and accuse the companions involved of ulterior motives ranging from enmity towards ‘Ali to outright hypocrisy. Though both Sunnis and Shias believe that the incident at Ghdier Khum occurred, Sunnis interpret the announcement as a form of praise for Ali and do not view it as having any injunctive effect insofar as the question of succession is concerned.

Historical Background of Sunni-Shiite Split

Thirty years after Muhammad’s death, the Islamic community plunged into a civil war, called the Fitna. Many Muslims (among them some of Muhammad’s widows and companions) believed that Uthman, the third Caliph, was favoring his kin and abusing his power. Discontented Muslim soldiers from garrisons in Iraq and Egypt surrounded Uthman’s house in Medina and demanded that he repent or resign. The Caliph temporized, fighting broke out, and Uthman was killed as he sat reading the Qur’an. Though Ali was appointed Caliph upon Uthman’s death, he was opposed by Muawiyah, the governor of Syria and a relative of Uthman’s. Muawiyah claimed that because Ali had taken no action to apprehend Uthman’s killers, Ali was complicit in his murder. Muawiyah consolidated his own power and refused to accept ‘Ali’s authority until Uthman’s assassins were brought to justice. Ali was not able to resolve the crisis before he was assassinated by a rebel faction, and Muawiyah claimed the Caliphate upon his death. Muawiyah’s rise to power marked the beginning of the Umayyad dynasty, and he managed to bring most of the Muslim community (ummah) under his authority and put an end to the civil war.

So, for hundreds of years, people have been killing each other over whether some self-proclaimed, possibly unhinged “prophet” would rather have his best friend babble about what he believed, or leave it to his son-in-law? This is the schism? This is what people die over? Makes one think of the classic scene about the birth of Christian sectarianism from Monty Python’s “The Life of Brian.” While being chased by fanatical followers in the desert, Brian drops both a gourd and a shoe at the same time. Immediately, separate factions in the group chasing him take up the meaning of each incident:

[holy music]

FOLLOWERS: Oh! Oh! Ohh! Oh! Ah! Oh!

ARTHUR: He has given us a sign!

FOLLOWER: Oh!

SHOE FOLLOWER: He has given us… His shoe!

ARTHUR: The shoe is the sign. Let us follow His example.

SPIKE: What?

ARTHUR: Let us, like Him, hold up one shoe and let the other be upon our foot, for this is His sign, that all who follow Him shall do likewise.

EDDIE: Yes.

SHOE FOLLOWER: No, no, no. The shoe is…

YOUTH: No.

SHOE FOLLOWER: …a sign that we must gather shoes together in abundance.

GIRL: Cast off…

SPIKE: Aye. What?

GIRL: …the shoes! Follow the Gourd!

SHOE FOLLOWER: No! Let us gather shoes together!

FRANK: Yes.

SHOE FOLLOWER: Let me!

ELSIE: Oh, get off!

YOUTH: No, no! It is a sign that, like Him, we must think not of the things of the body, but of the face and head!

SHOE FOLLOWER: Give me your shoe!

YOUTH: Get off!

GIRL: Follow the Gourd! The Holy Gourd of Jerusalem!

FOLLOWER: The Gourd!

HARRY: Hold up the sandal, as He has commanded us!

ARTHUR: It is a shoe! It is a shoe!

HARRY: It’s a sandal!

ARTHUR: No, it isn’t!

GIRL: Cast it away!

ARTHUR: Put it on!

YOUTH: And clear off!

SHOE FOLLOWER: Take the shoes and follow Him!

GIRL: Come…

FRANK: Yes!

GIRL: …all ye who call yourself Gourdenes!

SPIKE: Stop! Stop! Stop, I say! Stop! Let us– let us pray. Yea, He cometh to us, like the seed to the grain.

  • Share/Bookmark

Pasta Man vibrations, positive

20 August 2005 by Ron


mortgage home equity loan

When mortgage home equity loan removes the SIM Card, it can be re-inserted into another phone and used as normal.

loans instant

The loans instant can be loans instant totem custom-decorated to reflect the owner’s personality.

wholesale aames loan home

As Receiving Party Pays systems have wholesale aames loan home effect of phone owners keeping their phones turned off to avoid receiving unwanted calls, the total voice usage rates (and profits) in Calling Party Pays countries outperform those in Receiving Party Pays countries.

loan refinancing

By tracking loan refinancing of the SIM card and correlating other loan refinancing s that had been registered in those areas, police were able to locate the terrorists.

loans auto cheap

When loans auto cheap removes the SIM Card, it can be re-inserted into another phone and used as normal.

loan companies military

In 1984, Bell Labs developed modern commercial cellular technology (based, to loan companies military extent, on the Gladden, Parelman Patent), which employed multiple, centrally-controlled base stations (cell sites), each providing service to a small area (a cell).

usda loans

The breakthrough came after usda loans Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the United Arab Emirates-based General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) granted full approval for the AeroMobile system to be used on Emirates.

credit loan auto bad chicago

The service concept spread quickly in Europe and Asia and developed into credit loan auto bad chicago dollar industry.

loans credit poor student

In December 1993, loans credit poor student person-to-person SMS text message was transmitted in Finland.

company sloan valve

Due to their low establishment costs and rapid deployment, company sloan valve networks have since spread rapidly throughout company sloan valve outstripping the growth of fixed telephony.

  • Share/Bookmark

Intelligent Falling

19 August 2005 by Sean

From The Onion, which is (finally) getting funny again:

Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New ‘Intelligent Falling’ Theory

KANSAS CITY, KS—As the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools continues, a new controversy over the science curriculum arose Monday in this embattled Midwestern state. Scientists from the Evangelical Center For Faith-Based Reasoning are now asserting that the long-held “theory of gravity” is flawed, and they have responded to it with a new theory of Intelligent Falling.
Rev. Gabriel Burdett (left) explains Intelligent Falling.
Above: Rev. Gabriel Burdett (left) explains Intelligent Falling.

“Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, ‘God’ if you will, is pushing them down,” said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University.

Burdett added: “Gravity—which is taught to our children as a law—is founded on great gaps in understanding. The laws predict the mutual force between all bodies of mass, but they cannot explain that force. Isaac Newton himself said, ‘I suspect that my theories may all depend upon a force for which philosophers have searched all of nature in vain.’ Of course, he is alluding to a higher power.”

Founded in 1987, the ECFR is the world’s leading institution of evangelical physics, a branch of physics based on literal interpretation of the Bible.

According to the ECFR paper published simultaneously this week in the International Journal Of Science and the adolescent magazine God’s Word For Teens!, there are many phenomena that cannot be explained by secular gravity alone, including such mysteries as how angels fly, how Jesus ascended into Heaven, and how Satan fell when cast out of Paradise.

The ECFR, in conjunction with the Christian Coalition and other Christian conservative action groups, is calling for public-school curriculums to give equal time to the Intelligent Falling theory. They insist they are not asking that the theory of gravity be banned from schools, but only that students be offered both sides of the issue “so they can make an informed decision.”

“We just want the best possible education for Kansas’ kids,” Burdett said.

Proponents of Intelligent Falling assert that the different theories used by secular physicists to explain gravity are not internally consistent. Even critics of Intelligent Falling admit that Einstein’s ideas about gravity are mathematically irreconcilable with quantum mechanics. This fact, Intelligent Falling proponents say, proves that gravity is a theory in crisis.

“Let’s take a look at the evidence,” said ECFR senior fellow Gregory Lunsden.”In Matthew 15:14, Jesus says, ‘And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.’ He says nothing about some gravity making them fall—just that they will fall. Then, in Job 5:7, we read, ‘But mankind is born to trouble, as surely as sparks fly upwards.’ If gravity is pulling everything down, why do the sparks fly upwards with great surety? This clearly indicates that a conscious intelligence governs all falling.”

Critics of Intelligent Falling point out that gravity is a provable law based on empirical observations of natural phenomena. Evangelical physicists, however, insist that there is no conflict between Newton’s mathematics and Holy Scripture.

“Closed-minded gravitists cannot find a way to make Einstein’s general relativity match up with the subatomic quantum world,” said Dr. Ellen Carson, a leading Intelligent Falling expert known for her work with the Kansan Youth Ministry. “They’ve been trying to do it for the better part of a century now, and despite all their empirical observation and carefully compiled data, they still don’t know how.”

“Traditional scientists admit that they cannot explain how gravitation is supposed to work,” Carson said. “What the gravity-agenda scientists need to realize is that ‘gravity waves’ and ‘gravitons’ are just secular words for ‘God can do whatever He wants.’”

Some evangelical physicists propose that Intelligent Falling provides an elegant solution to the central problem of modern physics.

“Anti-falling physicists have been theorizing for decades about the ‘electromagnetic force,’ the ‘weak nuclear force,’ the ’strong nuclear force,’ and so-called ‘force of gravity,’” Burdett said. “And they tilt their findings toward trying to unite them into one force. But readers of the Bible have already known for millennia what this one, unified force is: His name is Jesus.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Julia Sweeney’s loss of faith

15 August 2005 by Ron

Atheist poster-girl Julia Sweeney (SNL’s “Pat”, and GF of “Wolf” in Pulp Fiction) has a book coming out called “My Beautiful Loss of Faith Story : A Memoir“. She’s hitting the interview circuit to promote it, so there’s a nice interview in the S.F. Chronicle today: Finding My Religion: Julia Sweeney talks about how she became an atheist.

I like Julia; she does a nice job of presenting how an apparently warm, funny, decent woman might make the journey to atheist in an understandable and not overly-intellectualized way. We need more of her. Check out the interview; maybe even order the book.

  • Share/Bookmark

Theocracy and the once “fucking”-friendly FCC

12 August 2005 by Ron

The FCC has continued to drive toward more “decency enforcement” since the departure of Michael Powell as director. (Although Colin’s son did some bad things too, he had some interesting high points. Most notable in my view was the ruling that said Bono’s use of the word “fucking” on live network TV was OK because it was used as a generic amplifying adjective — as in “that’s fucking brilliant” — and not a sexually-related verb — as in “Pat’s fucking William”. This inspired one of the most profane bills ever in Congress.

Now, they’ve hired an explicit lobbyist for theocratic control of media as a special advisor in their Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis (FCC Hires Conservative Indecency Critic). As the always-fun Adult Christianity points out (”FCC Offers a Penny for Your Thoughts“), Ms. Nance “has worked as a lobbyist for the Center for Reclaiming America and … served on the board of Concerned Women for America… [which both] seek to impose Biblical principles on public policy.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Xian Anti-gay Hate Campaign Targets Starbucks

11 August 2005 by Sean

From Doug Ireland’s great blog Direland today:

The latest target in the wave of anti-gay boycotts and pressure campaigns
that have been so successful in making Corporate America bend the knee to the Christers is Starbucks, which is accused of promoting homosexual values and child molestation on its coffee cups.

To read the details, go here.

Be sure you read Doug’s earlier story about how Proctor & Gamble caved into pressure from these groups and pulled its advertising from shows like Queer Eye for the Straight Guy.

Man, these radical Xians are emboldened these days. We must fight back. Time for a gay rights march on Washington, with plenty of sympathetic straight people along for the ride. Show these bozos that the majority of America is sick of their crap.

  • Share/Bookmark

“The Christian Paradox”

10 August 2005 by Sean

A friend brought to my attention a great article by Bill McKibben in the current Harper’s… It deals with American Christian hypocricy.

Snippet:

Three quarters of Americans believe the Bible teaches that “God helps those who help themselves.” That is, three out of four Americans believe that this uber-American idea, a notion at the core of our current individualist politics and culture, which was in fact uttered by Ben Franklin, actually appears in Holy Scripture. The thing is, not only is Franklin’s wisdom not biblical; it’s counter-biblical. Few ideas could be further from the gospel message, with its radical summons to love of neighbor. On this essential matter, most Americans—most American Christians—are simply wrong, as if 75 percent of American scientists believed that Newton proved gravity causes apples to fly up.

You can read a longer excerpt here.

  • Share/Bookmark